Influence of implant design, length, diameter, and anatomic region on implant stability: a randomized clinical trial

Objectives: To evaluate the influence of implant geometry and anatomical region on stability. Methods: A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted 45 patients, in whom a total 79 implants were placed: 40 MIS C1 Implants 39 Seven Implants. The stability quotient measured using resonance frequency analysis immediately after placement 8 weeks later with an Osstell Mentor device. Results: 76 analyzed. statistically significantly higher for secondary than primary (68.7±8,6 vs. 65.2±10.3, respectively, p=0.023). Considering stability, no statistical differences found between lengths 8.0 mm, 10.0 11.0 11.5 mm (67.9±7.6, 63.9±10, 57.2±11.1, 66.4±11.3, p=0.312). same observed (68.4±9.4, 67.9±9.3, 74.7±1.5, 69.2±7.9, p=0.504). Also, there significant diameters 3.75 4.20 concerning (64.3±8.7 66.1±11.7 p=0.445) or (68.8±8.2 68.7±9.1 p=0.930). Regarding design, difference only favoring (p=0.048). intraoral location both as these anterior maxilla posterior mandible (p<0.05). Conclusions: diameter length studied did not their Implant design may whereas has relevant effect